"When remote viewing, I tell myself what my objective is in the broadest terms to allow for large variations between what I imagine and what is real. For example, I'm pretty sure Person A is at work, as this is the usual time for Person A to be at work. I want to see if Person A is ok because we had a weird conversation the night before and know Person A has reason to be upset. But instead of bringing in any of that context, I just tell myself "I want to see and hear Person A from a close perspective that allows me to see their face and to see and hear some of what is going on around them." Then I go into what I call "pure observer" mode. I silience every thought and become essentially a human tape recorder. Not even recognition of objects is permitted in such a state: the beingness just flows through me, influencing me only enough to write a record on the mental tape. I record for a few minutes and them return to normal consciousness and view the tape. Only now do I find out what my result was. WARNING: using this method, you can (and eventually will) get an eyeful of something you were definitely not meant to see, like someone using the bathroom. It is only ethical to immediately cease viewing. It may also be ethical to forget what you saw. If no ethical violation exists, you can use the viewing to try to answer your more detailed questions. Try not to assume anything, just take the input as it comes and realize that you are only getting a snapshot of reality, perhaps a snapshot highly colored by your or another's peceptual filters.
"

"If we believe - it is. There are separate realities, when there are multiple participants. Each feel on their own terms, but the source is the same. This is the essence of the One. In a sense, each of us is a string, vibrating in rhythm, rhyme, and time, to the harmonic splendor of the One."

"What I mean by that is the reality of spying would be correct for one participant, who may not desire that action, while for another participant, the words "remote influencing: may be their reality, with no negative connotations. Two different reactions to the same action. Also, I am reluctant to believe, from decades of experience with remote healing, that free will is ever violated. Permission from the higher self must always be granted, before an action can be received. So, one action has multiple reactions(realities) by those involved. I hope this gives more depth and clarity to the original answer.
Namaste...."

"Higher self always knows when it is being called. Soul always moves you deeper within the self. This is a channel for divine grace. When you send love and healing to another being, the energy you send is initially received by that being's energy field. If the being chooses to take the healing energy on-board, then its higher self is aware the loving energy is available at any moment. YOu are in fact that being and every other being. You desire to be liberated from anyone you have yet to forgive and hidden guilt you harbour that has yet to be forgiven. You are free to live without fear. As you move to stop fearing deeper elements of the self, soul and Higher forces, you discover you remote view it all every moment, but sometimes choose to close physical and inner eyes. You are the answer. This is your inner journey of bravery, faith and trust. You are opening up to discern more inner messages. Listen closely."